MadTracker.org
Forum - Wave Export ...
Log in Log in Profile Profile Search Memberlist Usergroups FAQ FAQ
 Forum
Suggestions
 Wave Export ...
Reply to topic Post new topic  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
CHICAGO子ollie
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14 2004 06:52    
Reply with quote

Walter Vos wrote:
CHICAGO子ollie wrote:

(...) If you're mastering, it'd be nice to get the instrumets by themselves easily, instead of ticking every track you need for the melody, drums, or whatever. (...)


Mastering and mixdown are different things Lollie, Mastering is two channels (left and right (or 6 if mastering for 5.1 I guess)), and mixdown is probably what you're talking about, with all channels separately.

Whoops, mixdown, that's the one. My bad! Embarassed

*edits*


Walter Vos wrote:
Yes I **** ants (they should introduce this word in English, it means that you're real precise about things).

Edit: funny, the forum is censored Shocked

Really? Shit, when the fuck did that happen? Shocked

Mr. Green


 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
CHICAGO子ollie
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14 2004 06:58    
Re: I see...
Reply with quote

MC Project wrote:
Well, Chicago Lollie, I didn't mean any offense and I also know that there shouldn't be a limit to tracking, but I think that professional trackers should know how to organize their tracks. Sure it would be handy to export by instruments, but on the other hand you can seperate a melody in several parts. That is the way I make melodies though. I'm used to the annoyance of using many tracks for a melody and I think it is a good thing, so you can learn to manage your stuff. Just my opinion. It is not a must have to me.

Ah, ok, fair enough. Guess it all depends on how someone structures their tunes.
*ends up having them half-messy like* Rolling Eyes


MC Project wrote:
I don't freaking care about the smileys. You still understand it right? So there is no problem, lol Smile

Yeah yeah... still bugs me though.. I'm a smiley nazi, so to speak. Rolling Eyes


 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Walter Vos
Registered User


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14 2004 18:19    
Reply with quote

Quote:
Really? Shit, when the **** did that happen?


and how the **** is that possible?

Pray

Edit: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!


what is hip?

www.waltervos.nl

Last edited by Walter Vos on Sun Aug 15 2004 10:31; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MC Project
Registered User


Joined: 06 Jul 2003
Location: The Hague
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15 2004 09:39    
Lol...
Reply with quote

CHICAGO子ollie. Yes, structure your tunes. It sounds kind of strictly doesn't it? Actually everyone has a structure in their songs. It is a pain in the ass to learn, I know, but once you are used to it, it has the advantage that you have an overview and you are able to 'understand' your song, which has its advantages again. I don't wanna act smart or start a discussion by the way. Just thought that maybe this would help in some way Wink

I'll use the smileys then if it bothers you. A small effort Cool


Sure......I am the MCP....Or just MC...Uhmmm...I make battle music...There....That is more then enough...
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CHICAGO子ollie
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15 2004 11:50    
Reply with quote

Walter Vos wrote:
Quote:
Really? Shit, when the **** did that happen?


and how the **** is that possible?

Pray

Edit: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!

Haha, dang, this censored diddly's fucking bugging you, ain't it? Mr. Green

Try quoting my post. You'll then see the method behind madness. Wink



MC: Oh yeah, yeah, I see where you're coming from. Only real reason why I'm supporting the IBI export, apart from the idea of a optionally slightly more complex system, is that the structure I've developed is quite compact. I try to use as few tracks as I can, and I rarely ever reach 32 tracks because of this instrument/track interlinking I've come used to. Wink [/sidetopic]

And hehe, nah, don't worry about the smiley diddly, I'm just being a pain in the ass. Rolling Eyes


 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply to topic Post new topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Page 3 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Copyright © 1998-2005 Yannick Delwiche
All rights reserved