Inge
Man-At-Arms
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
|
Posted: Thu May 15 2003 18:17 MadTracker 2.3 |
|
[Yannick: This is moved from the MT3 suggestions box thread.]
Er, I'm getting confused
a: will mt 2.3 have an undo *and* track naming? I assume mt3 will, but it would also be very nice for mt 2.3
Inge |
Care for a game of Monopoly? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
sz1
Beta-Tester
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finnish CyberSpace
|
Posted: Thu May 15 2003 18:54
|
|
Inge wrote: |
Er, I'm getting confused
a: will mt 2.3 have an undo *and* track naming? I assume mt3 will, but it would also be very nice for mt 2.3
Inge
|
Undo: mt3
Track names: mt3 (mt2.3???) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu May 15 2003 23:15
|
|
at least: tracknames MT 2.3 (according to an IRC conversation with Yannick a looong time ago ) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sonitus
Beta-Tester
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri May 23 2003 09:35
|
|
sz1 wrote: |
MyztiQue wrote: |
in response to KSO: track-naming will be available already in MT2.3.0b...
|
Not in beta version I got yet.
|
maybe not, but the version I have has it |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CHICAGO¤lollie
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 25 2003 12:45
|
|
Track naming, `ey?
Although having track names in MT2.3 would be nice, it's all in the name of compatibility.
How would a previous version of MT2 cope with tunes made in 2.3? (For those who just can't let go)
And would a previous versioned tune load correctly? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blaster
Registered User
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Netherlands/Germany
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 00:46
|
|
this would be easy and no problem: MT checks the file for tracknames and if they're not present they get default names (or stay empty, not sure how Yannick implements it). I think you shouldn't be worried about this |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CHICAGO¤lollie
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 11:01
|
|
But as for previous versions of MT loading new version tunes? (Some just can't let go ) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yannick
MadTracker Author
Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 12:43
|
|
Don't worry about that.
Obviously, previous MT2 versions will have troubles reading 64-tracks modules.
But for track naming, there is no problem.
Yannick |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CHICAGO¤lollie
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 13:05
|
|
64?!
Did I miss something here?
Whoa |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pjo2000
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 15:10
|
|
ummm heheh yeah you did lollie
that was the whole idea of mt2.3 64 tracks and some bug fixes and slight enhancements
something to tie us over till mt3
pjo2000 |
http://www.projectoverkill.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D Vibe
Registered User
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 18:07
|
|
Will there pop up some warning that if they try to load a 64 track MT2 in an older version of MT2 they are recommended to download the new one? And maybe some cheesy link to madtracker.org? |
https://www.dvibe.se |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yannick
MadTracker Author
Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 18:13
|
|
Old MT2 versions will warn you that you are trying to open a module created by a newer version.
Up to you to open it or not.
Yannick |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
XnmE
Registered User
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
|
Posted: Mon May 26 2003 19:34
|
|
Do anyone remember about loading up to 512 samples? |
Music Is ThE GatE
--------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CHICAGO¤lollie
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 27 2003 05:43
|
|
512?!!!
Shit, I really did miss something then!
Cool, so that's 64 tracks, 512 samples, and a slight interface enhancement to look forard too...
...
...
...
YAY! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sz1
Beta-Tester
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finnish CyberSpace
|
Posted: Tue May 27 2003 07:55
|
|
I am looking forward a new 2.3 beta then, Yannick. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|