Posted: Sun Nov 30 2003 13:42 synchronized sample and '90' command
I was just checking out this synchronized sample thing when I came across what could be a bug.?
it appears that 8000 parameter for 90 command starts the sample from the beginning rather than from the 128th beat. And 9000 is the same as 1000, etc... Now, I can't see why this is useful, so I think it's a bug... (and it also means I'm gonna have to cut my 4 minute sample smaller pieces )
Log in
Profile
FAQ
)
Back to top
