AVALON
User
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands (den haag)
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17 2004 23:31 Wave Export ... |
|
I think that it would be great if Madtracker 3 had
a feature in the Wave-export where you could Export
all your tracks at the same time !
For example :
Song: Hardstyle
Tracks: 12
Using this feature would mean that instead of exporting
your song one track at the time,it would export all 12
tracks to a specified folder. |
End Of File : |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Inge
Man-At-Arms
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17 2004 23:34
|
|
[edit: misinterpreted the question. silly me. nevermind my answer that used to be here]
Inge |
Care for a game of Monopoly?
Last edited by Inge on Sun Jan 18 2004 14:08; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TOffe
Beta-Tester
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: nomad
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18 2004 09:28
|
|
This is something that is really misssing in mt2 so far. specially now when you can use even more than 32 tracks. If you have a song which is 8-9 minutes long and want's to export like 40-50 tracks of music that will take forever. This is one big reason I rearly master stuff I made in madtracker, not track by track anyway. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AVALON
User
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands (den haag)
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22 2004 23:54
|
|
Quote: |
[edit: misinterpreted the question. silly me. nevermind my answer that used to be here]
|
No biggy |
End Of File : |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AVALON
User
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands (den haag)
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22 2004 23:55
|
|
But to stay on-Topic...
What do you think Yannick ????? |
End Of File : |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Inge
Man-At-Arms
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23 2004 00:19
|
|
Batch exporting would be sweet indeed. Any chance, most regarded programmer?
Inge |
Care for a game of Monopoly? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Enonimis
Regular
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Canton Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23 2004 00:38
|
|
Yes that would indeed be sweet. Any thoughts grand master? |
If you do not agree with my opinions, you are wrong. If you do agree with my opinions you are drunk.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://elrick-enonimis.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23 2004 07:49
|
|
Yes, that would be a much needed addition to the wave export *insert flattering line adressing the programmer* |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
goose
Registered User
Joined: 11 May 2003
Location: aroundabout
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23 2004 10:52
|
|
Yes, I'll second that. Especially now there's over 32 tracks involved. How much work would be involved to implement this, Yannick? Or is it unrealistic to expect such a thing in MT2? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blaster
Registered User
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Netherlands/Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23 2004 10:59
|
|
Hmm I hope Yannick has all this sorted out. Some features are requested for MT2 and other for MT3. This one would fit nice in the MT2 category along with some bugfixes maybe
With my limited programming skills I would think this isn't *that* difficult or time-consuming to do, but only Yannick knows the code. |
united trackers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Szartd
User
Joined: 30 May 2003
Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01 2004 03:48 hammena |
|
TOffe wrote: |
This is something that is really misssing in mt2 so far. specially now when you can use even more than 32 tracks. If you have a song which is 8-9 minutes long and want's to export like 40-50 tracks of music that will take forever. This is one big reason I rearly master stuff I made in madtracker, not track by track anyway.
|
It will **** up alot of stuff when that would be available in mt2 (or mt3 using old mt2 files maybe) , because of using (for example) track 45's reverb for track 3 5 7 and 22 , and then route it to track 47 for a delay ann and and .... I guess you'll get my point |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
InHousePussy
Registered User
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01 2004 06:14
|
|
I love u're syntax. Could understand a thing that u wrote. but that's just then,,, <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<what????? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CHICAGO¤lollie
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01 2004 06:42
|
|
I understood him, I think.
I think he's talking about exporting tracks that are linked to effect-based tracks.
Like he said, say you've got a song with 50 or so tracks, tracks 2, 3, 5, and 22 are linked to track 45, so those tracks have mpReverb because track 45 does, but track 45 is linked to track 47 which has a delay effect, so tracks 2, 3, 5, 22, and 45 all have a reverb effect and a delay effect at the same time.
The question here is... If you're exporting the tracks separately, would it work out in the end?
At least that's how I interpreted it |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
InHousePussy
Registered User
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01 2004 06:45
|
|
hope u're right lollie!!
P.S still drunk... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CHICAGO¤lollie
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01 2004 06:53
|
|
inhousepussy wrote: |
P.S still drunk...
|
Whoops, I forgot... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|