Scandinavian Noize Syndic
User
Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Location: denmark
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17 2007 17:11 madtracker skins,would be awesome |
|
hi
just thought it would be cool with some different madtracker skins(like the ones you can get for renoise)i dont know if it would be hard to make
does anyone have any thoughts on that?? |
Scandinavian Noize Syndicate
www.myspace.com/scandinaviannoizesyndicate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Prometheus-3
Regular
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Location: My house, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 08:18
|
|
Only one problem. MT2 will chew up extra CPU |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 10:20
|
|
yeah... I'm all for things looking good, but when it comes to programs that are processor intense anyway, I'd rather have a program with a logical and functioning GUI which has a minimal footprint on the CPU, than one with bells and whistles. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
goose
Registered User
Joined: 11 May 2003
Location: aroundabout
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 12:26
|
|
Sunbuster wrote: |
yeah... I'm all for things looking good, but when it comes to programs that are processor intense anyway, I'd rather have a program with a logical and functioning GUI which has a minimal footprint on the CPU, than one with bells and whistles.
|
Agreed. I wouldn't use them... But I think skins was planned for MT3 anyway. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
G3ronimo
Hot & Sexeh
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Location: The Netherlands, Wezep
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 12:46
|
|
goose wrote: |
Sunbuster wrote: |
yeah... I'm all for things looking good, but when it comes to programs that are processor intense anyway, I'd rather have a program with a logical and functioning GUI which has a minimal footprint on the CPU, than one with bells and whistles.
|
Agreed. I wouldn't use them... But I think skins was planned for MT3 anyway.
|
MT3... MT3... I browsed back a few years in topics, and in 2002-2003 people were already talking fondly about MT3 like it would come out in a couple of months... now I wonder IF it will ever come out, it takes really really reeeeaaaallyy long, I kinda lost all hope |
www.soundsector.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elijah
Registered User
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Eh?
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 15:14
|
|
really tho. mt2.5 does what mt3 would have. and i think that 2.5 is satisfying enough to fill my tracking needs. eveen if this was all i got i would still register now... |
- Elijah |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goose
Registered User
Joined: 11 May 2003
Location: aroundabout
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 17:58
|
|
G3ronimo wrote: |
MT3... MT3... I browsed back a few years in topics, and in 2002-2003 people were already talking fondly about MT3 like it would come out in a couple of months... now I wonder IF it will ever come out, it takes really really reeeeaaaallyy long, I kinda lost all hope
|
Haha yeah I guess it's so much work, and hard to find time once you're older, got job, got more ideas etc... I believe it will arrive eventually, but I'm not worried about when. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22 2007 19:17
|
|
Elijah wrote: |
really tho. mt2.5 does what mt3 would have. and i think that 2.5 is satisfying enough to fill my tracking needs. eveen if this was all i got i would still register now...
|
True, afaik MT2.5 has a lot of the functions that originally were planned for MT3. So in that sense I see no need to hurry anymore... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|