MadTracker.org
Forum - 24-bit samples (..again)
Log in Log in Profile Profile Search Memberlist Usergroups FAQ FAQ
 Forum
General discussion
 24-bit samples (..again)
Reply to topic Post new topic  
sheepoid
Registered User


Joined: 18 May 2003
Location: England
PostPosted: Wed Jul 13 2005 12:51    
24-bit samples (..again)
Reply with quote

It's been mentioned here before - even so I can't help but reiterate my slight frustration: it's a real shame that MT cannot yet support 24-bit samples. I hate having to downgrade my own beautiful, pristine 24-bit samples, or those from the various mags (Computer Music, Future Music, etc.,).

I still like MT a lot, and currently have no intention of moving over to Renoise (even though it does 24-bit samples Smile ).

Regards,

David,
England.
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
sheepoid
Registered User


Joined: 18 May 2003
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 14:49    
Reply with quote

Looks like I'm gonna have to suffer the humiliation of no responses Crying or Very sad Oh well, I still live in hope...
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Walter Vos
Registered User


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 15:12    
Re: 24-bit samples (..again)
Reply with quote

sheepoid wrote:
It's been mentioned here before - even so I can't help but reiterate my slight frustration: it's a real shame that MT cannot yet support 24-bit samples. I hate having to downgrade my own beautiful, pristine 24-bit samples, or those from the various mags (Computer Music, Future Music, etc.,).

I still like MT a lot, and currently have no intention of moving over to Renoise (even though it does 24-bit samples Smile ).

Regards,

David,
England.


Euhm... I don't really care about 24 bit, I'd rather have full vst support first. cd's are still 16 bit too, so you'll be downgrading in the end anyway.


what is hip?

www.waltervos.nl
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
sheepoid
Registered User


Joined: 18 May 2003
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 16:28    
Reply with quote

Walter Vos wrote:

Quote:
Euhm... I don't really care about 24 bit, I'd rather have full vst support first. cd's are still 16 bit too, so you'll be downgrading in the end anyway.


My needs are probably different to yours. I use VSTs too - but mainly VST effects. VSTi's simply don't give me the flexibility I need like samples do. You try creating a realistic, 'organic' sax or guitar solo using a VSTi - you just can't do it (or if you can then it's with a lot of hassle).

Yes, CD's are of course 16 bit quality, but creating music with 16-bit samples goes against pretty much every article I've read on mastering and pro music production... "Keep everything at 24-bit right until the mastering stage, then dither down to 16 bits".

I'm currently working on an album; I want it to sound as good as I can possibly make it, and I want to use MT and my growing collection of 24 bit samples.

Regards,
David.
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Walter Vos
Registered User


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 17:37    
Reply with quote

sheepoid wrote:
Yes, CD's are of course 16 bit quality, but creating music with 16-bit samples goes against pretty much every article I've read on mastering and pro music production... "Keep everything at 24-bit right until the mastering stage, then dither down to 16 bits".


yeah, while i was writing i was thinking 'hmm.. i'm not sure if that's true'. well, i have no objection for 24 bit support, but it's indeed not a top priority for me. i'm planning on using real instruments too in the next year, but i'll just get a musician to my home and record them in cubase with madtracker rewired (or exported tracks).


what is hip?

www.waltervos.nl
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
QBical
Registered User


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Utrecht , The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 18:34    
Reply with quote

Isn't addapting 24bit support just a small step in the code? The wave export supports 24bit so why would the playback engine not support it?

Grtz!
Raymond


PC: P4 HT 3ghz, 1gb ram, 500GB+ Storage, plextor DVD-rw, M-audo Audiophile 2496
Laptop: Apple Powerbook G4 15inch
Other Stuff: Phonic MU802 mixer, Alesis M1 Active Mk2 Monitors, Ipod 2nd gen. 20GB, maxtor firewire HD 80GB
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Yannick
MadTracker Author


Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Location: Belgium
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 19:25    
Reply with quote

I could see to convert 24-bit WAV files to 16-bit. But a native 24-bit sampler in the engine will be too much work.

Yannick
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
realisation
Registered User


Joined: 05 Aug 2003
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 20:26    
Reply with quote

how about using a VSTi that supports 24-bit samples?

i have to admit i'm still using madtrackers built in sample engine a lot (with vst effects,etc) but there are a lot of samplers out there that can support 24-bit and do stuff madtracker's engine can't do (and vice versa of course..)

take a look at v-sampler, it looks pretty amazing
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message
sheepoid
Registered User


Joined: 18 May 2003
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 21:10    
Reply with quote

realisation wrote:
how about using a VSTi that supports 24-bit samples?

i have to admit i'm still using madtrackers built in sample engine a lot (with vst effects,etc) but there are a lot of samplers out there that can support 24-bit and do stuff madtracker's engine can't do (and vice versa of course..)

take a look at v-sampler, it looks pretty amazing


You still can't use most of MT's effect commands with such a VSTi... I, for one, make very heavy use of 1xx/1xxxx, 2xx/2xxxx, 4xx/4xxxx, 3xx/3xxxx, 9xx, EDx and E9x - sadly only EDx can be used with VSTi's. In addition, stereo panning and volume control are easy, efficient and predictable with samples (but depending on the VSTi, they can be a real pain).

Don't get me wrong - I love VSTs and VSTis - I've collected well over 100 of them, and am deeply thankful to Yannick for providing support for them, but at the end of the day, MT's native effect commands give near-total control over how samples are played - and this is essential when you're trying to emulate sax, guitar and flute solos (amongst many other things of course) Smile

In any case, I'll check out V-Sampler as you suggested (...err hopefully it's free).

Regards,
David.
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
QBical
Registered User


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Utrecht , The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14 2005 22:22    
Reply with quote

Yannick wrote:
I could see to convert 24-bit WAV files to 16-bit. But a native 24-bit sampler in the engine will be too much work.


Well that would work for me! I have lots of 24bit samples lying arount from different music mags. It would be great to use them in an easy way in madtracker!
And the 16bit quality doesn't realy bother me...

But...

Isn't it possible to use an 16bit emulation of the sample for playback, and still keep the 24bit file, and use the native 24bit file for wave export?

Grtz
Raymond


PC: P4 HT 3ghz, 1gb ram, 500GB+ Storage, plextor DVD-rw, M-audo Audiophile 2496
Laptop: Apple Powerbook G4 15inch
Other Stuff: Phonic MU802 mixer, Alesis M1 Active Mk2 Monitors, Ipod 2nd gen. 20GB, maxtor firewire HD 80GB
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply to topic Post new topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Copyright © 1998-2005 Yannick Delwiche
All rights reserved