MadTracker.org
Forum - [advice] Help for purchase of a small mixer
Log in Log in Profile Profile Search Memberlist Usergroups FAQ FAQ
 Forum
General discussion
 [advice] Help for purchase of a small mixer
Reply to topic Post new topic  
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31 2006 10:01    
[advice] Help for purchase of a small mixer
Reply with quote

I've decided to buy the speakers (Behringer Truth B-2031A), but I'm still undecided about the mixer. I'm interested in the cute Behringer-mixers, and I'm doubting between the UB-802, UB-1002 and UB-1002FX. From what I can tell, they all lack balanced XLR-outputs, which apparently is quite a drawback.

The question is: are there mixers below 100 euro with +/- four line ins (and one or two mic ins) that are good and have a balanced output? Or should I neglect the latter and go for the 802 or 1002?

Update: the friendly people of Feedback pointed out that Phonic also makes very nice and budget-friendly mixers. Especially their MU 802, 1002 and 1202 are very nice. They're a bit confusing though. Two questions:

1: I thought a balanced output needs to be XLR, but Phonic says that the normal jack-outputs are also balanced. Some explanation would be nice.
2: What exactly does the following mean (taken from the MU 1202) concerning how many devices I can connect to it?
Inputs: 4 x Mic with 48V, 12 x line, 2 x stereo return, Channels: 4 x mono with 3 band EQ, 2 x stereo, 2 x FX return


Care for a game of Monopoly?

Last edited by Inge on Fri Mar 31 2006 13:12; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pablo
User


Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands, Nijmegen
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31 2006 10:20    
Reply with quote

Okay let's start with possible answers:
1. only with a stereo Jack(3pins) it would be possible to have a truly ballanced connection. On a simple mono jack this is not possible although you'd still be able to connect a balanced mic/source to an unbalanced input.(ballanced=1 pin ground 1 pin input 1 pin input,inversed)

2. Simply: 4 mono inputs, and 2 stereo inputs(or 4 mono inputs)
This would mean you have 8 mono chanels you can fully regulate.
But.... The (send)Returns can allso be used as an input from wich you can only regulate het volume.
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31 2006 11:04    
Reply with quote

Pablo wrote:
Okay let's start with possible answers:
1. only with a stereo Jack(3pins) it would be possible to have a truly ballanced connection. On a simple mono jack this is not possible although you'd still be able to connect a balanced mic/source to an unbalanced input.(ballanced=1 pin ground 1 pin input 1 pin input,inversed)

Thank you. Noted. So XLR is not the only way to create a balanced line with a ground?

Pablo wrote:
2. Simply: 4 mono inputs, and 2 stereo inputs(or 4 mono inputs)
This would mean you have 8 mono chanels you can fully regulate.
But.... The (send)Returns can allso be used as an input from wich you can only regulate het volume.

Thank you again. Does this mean that I can only attach two stereo devices? Or can I also connect stereo devices to two mono channels? That would leave me with four stereo inputs, if I'm not mistaken? For what purpose are mono inputs meant anyway? Which devices to connect are mono nowadays?


Care for a game of Monopoly?
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pablo
User


Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands, Nijmegen
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31 2006 12:54    
Reply with quote

It is the best option but not the only one, u only need a cable with 3 lines, 1 ground and 2 signal.

Yep u are correct, 4 mono = 2 stereo. So totaly you would have 4 stereo inputs.
Why mono? Mic inputs are mono. Most of the classical instruments used(guitars, drums, vocals) are picked up with microphones and then panned in to a direction. These mixers are used in small studio's or as a small stage mixer. For only stereo mixers look at dj-mixers or PA-mixers, Behringer has also a 2 mono 3 stereo micro mixer for 130,- http://www.behringer.com/UBB1002/index.cfm?lang=ENG

The question is more, for what purpose u want to use the mixer?
Maybe we need to start a new toppic on mixers Smile
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31 2006 13:20    
Reply with quote

Thanks for all that information. Tonight or tomorrow I'll head over to Feedback Rotterdam to gather all the stuff needed.

As for the inputs: I wish to attach atleast cd-player, md-player and my computer, and optional also a tuner and my mp3-player. I might want to use it in the future to make some radio recordings at home, so therefore my interest in stereo inputs.

But is it really necessary to use a mixer? Can't I use my current amplifier to pass through the signal without additional amplification? I don't think so (it only has normal copper wire outputs), but I just want to make sure that I'm buying things that I really need Smile

[and topic is split from the previous one. bright comment, thanks.]


Care for a game of Monopoly?
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
QBical
Registered User


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Utrecht , The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31 2006 18:49    
Reply with quote

I have the MU-802 mixer, it's great!

just don't let it sit under an open window when it's raining...

But it still works Very Happy


PC: P4 HT 3ghz, 1gb ram, 500GB+ Storage, plextor DVD-rw, M-audo Audiophile 2496
Laptop: Apple Powerbook G4 15inch
Other Stuff: Phonic MU802 mixer, Alesis M1 Active Mk2 Monitors, Ipod 2nd gen. 20GB, maxtor firewire HD 80GB
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01 2006 09:49    
Reply with quote

w00t! Everything bought, connected, and working Very Happy Listening to speakers and speaking to the person at Feedback convinced me of buying not the Behringer, but go for the KRK Rokit 5. They're connected to the Phonic 1002. So far I've only been able to playback at low volume, but the transparancy and clarity are marvellous. Pictures will follow.

Thanks for all the advice. Sunbuster won, because in the end your ears must agree on the choice made. Too bad for Behringer, but they sounded like they were enhancing the sound too much.


Care for a game of Monopoly?
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Sunbuster
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01 2006 10:25    
Reply with quote

Yyaaaayh! I'll be expecting my prize by the end of the week then, eyh? Cool I guess you'll have to listen through all the compo entries again now and re-evaluate? Wink
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
xiphiuz
Beta-Tester


Joined: 08 May 2003
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02 2006 07:34    
Reply with quote

Sjew.. I've read this from first to last post. I am glad you've chosen the krk rp5's! much better than behringer. Behringer is indeed enhancing en there are only 'good' in mid hehe.

about the mixer: I would have chosen the yamaha MG series, but what the heck Smile
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02 2006 14:16    
Reply with quote

Pictures! \o/











Care for a game of Monopoly?
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02 2006 14:29    
Reply with quote

xiphiuz wrote:
about the mixer: I would have chosen the yamaha MG series, but what the heck Smile


Yamaha was an alternative, but not in the price range I had in mind. Again, the Behringer was the worst option (according to the salesperson there), since their s/n-ratio would be pretty much aweful. I'm all happy now with the things I have Smile


Care for a game of Monopoly?
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
xiphiuz
Beta-Tester


Joined: 08 May 2003
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03 2006 08:47    
Reply with quote

Nice pictures!

BTW together with my dad I've also chosen the rp5's for my dad (1 year ago or something). As I said, they are much better then the Behringer 'Monitors'.

Phonic is about the same quality as behringer. Feedback is the nr 1 importer of Phonic, that's why all Feedback salesman are advising Phonic...
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message
Sunbuster
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03 2006 16:08    
Reply with quote

I did some small comparisons on behringers UB-1002 and phonics MU-1002. Don't they look pretty damn similar? Makes me wonder if they're not using the same technology to a large extent...
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Reply to topic Post new topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Copyright © 1998-2005 Yannick Delwiche
All rights reserved