MadTracker - Forum - I don,t wanna work with VST

Color scheme

Profile

FAQ

Forum

General discussion

I don,t wanna work with VST

Reply to topic

Post new topic

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3

xenomorph disturbance
User

Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Groninge(Holland)

Posted: Tue May 18 2004 17:02 thanks........
thanks everybody for explaning it to me...... I checked out the pages,and i have read it carefully.I only make traxx for myself(ofcourse all my mates got cd's from me)and will never send them to a record company,so the music keeps underground........so,i think it will be no problem for me if i wanna rip some,i never did such a thing,but i am now (for the first time) creating a remix of an existing file.
From da F#@king Northside!!!

InHousePussy
Registered User

Joined: 13 Nov 2003

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 04:28
Post the url when it's done.. Who r u ripping btw?

xenomorph disturbance
User

Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Groninge(Holland)

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 11:49

inhousepussy wrote:

Post the url when it's done..

Who r u ripping btw? Smile

I an now doing,the Fugees(killing me softly)but know as a drum&bass version......and one in the style 'house'from the ninetees........slow track about 145bpm.

From da F#@king Northside!!!

Walter Vos
Registered User

Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 13:41
I hope it's better then the one aphrodite did...
what is hip? www.waltervos.nl

xenomorph disturbance
User

Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Groninge(Holland)

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 16:22

Walter Vos wrote:

I hope it's better then the one aphrodite did... Rolling Eyes

i think it is something like aphrodite,but i make much louder breakz...........but i must say aphrodite is one of my favorites in the drum&bass scene,but no one on this earth will (in my few) be beter than Altern 8,that's my favorite group(everything complete)i geuss because everything they made was with fasttracker(still one of the best trackers i have worked with).

From da F#@king Northside!!!

xenomorph disturbance
User

Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Groninge(Holland)

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 16:30

inhousepussy wrote:

Post the url when it's done..

Who r u ripping btw? Smile

i don,t think i will ever get a track online,this is the first time,in my 26 years on earth,i,ve got internet,so i don,t know how to do that,and if i ever know,i would only place an mp3,never a mt2.file.So they cannot rip from me,or see how i make a track.......i don,t understand why others put their tracks online as xm or mt2.Everybody can see how they create and also can it be ripped,or do i see it wrong?

From da F#@king Northside!!!

InHousePussy
Registered User

Joined: 13 Nov 2003

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 19:37

xenomorph disturbance wrote:

inhousepussy wrote:

Post the url when it's done..

Who r u ripping btw? Smile

The way I see it, it's all about sharing and learning.That's what life is about,and who gives an feck about how one makes it.. If it's good,it's good, and if it's crap,well.....

MP3 or mt, doesn't matter...A'it!!? Wink

Sunbuster
Registered User

Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland

Posted: Wed May 19 2004 22:03
Well, the reason I've put some of my tunes online as mt2's is because I've learned so much about about making music in trackers by checking through other's songs, I feel it's only right to return the favour. Hopefully, people that are new to the scene can learn something from them. Like inhousepussy said, it's all about sharing and learning

TOffe
Beta-Tester

Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: nomad

Posted: Thu May 20 2004 00:19

Sunbuster wrote:

Well, the reason I've put some of my tunes online as mt2's is because I've learned so much about about making music in trackers by checking through other's songs, I feel it's only right to return the favour. Hopefully, people that are new to the scene can learn something from them. Like inhousepussy said, it's all about sharing and learning Wink

Agreed to a 100%
I just feel sorry for the ones that starts with tracking nowadays, there aren't so much stuff to learn from anymore because of all the mp3 ogg etc. releases. I don't mind sharing my source files when the file size allows it. And I would personally just be flattered if someone got ideas out of my music, it's not like they are going to end up on records anyway Smile

This is why I think the new hosting thing Yannick thought about sounds so nice, if just enough people would start useing it, but maybe that's just a little dream....

http://www.sonitusmusic.com
http://www.myspace.com/meltic

"You don't get harmony when everybody sings the same note." -Doug Floyd

xenomorph disturbance
User

Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Groninge(Holland)

Posted: Tue May 25 2004 16:38
Does anybody know how many(or how LONG) wav files u can put in one track,using madtracker........
From da F#@king Northside!!!

N0N
Registered User

Joined: 20 Oct 2003

Posted: Tue May 25 2004 17:52
Yea, I was a little questionable about vst implementation too. But now that it�s in, theirs no stopping me from using it. Cause for one, if it sounds good, do it, if you don�t then who is really being blind unto themselves. Because only you can define what you like, and that is were great music is. So find it everywhere you can, if it�s not in vst then so be it, but if you find something cool within it, do it. Besides music is easy, music is so easy that its insane people are making multi millions off the stuff. But that�s life, and I'm apart of the con . Oh and the wav thing, I've gotten uhmm... stereo 44khz about 8 min's worth, and multiple instances of it, and works quite well. I use a lot of recordings for my songs in MadTracker; it�s a lot easier then writing a riff note by note in MadTracker. ok maybe not easier but quicker, for sure.
... Last edited by N0N on Wed May 26 2004 19:00; edited 1 time in total

1wills.com
User

Joined: 16 May 2003
Location: USA

Posted: Tue May 25 2004 18:17
I agree with QBical. It's the results that matter, not what software you may or may not use. Everyone has their own favorite software that they like to use. Some people like MadTracker, some like FL Studio, some prefer Cubase -- the point is, people shouldn't waste their time telling the world that something is "crap", just because they prefer to use something else. There are advantages and disadvantages in all music software and nothing will ever be perfect. Create whatever you want using whatever software you prefer to use or have access to. Once it's converted to .wav or .mp3, the majority of people don't care how it was made. If it's good, people will listen. Just don't ever fall into the trap of "a bad workman always blaming his tools"

TOffe
Beta-Tester

Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: nomad

Posted: Tue May 25 2004 20:16

1wills.com wrote:

I agree with QBical. It's the results that matter, not what software you may or may not use. Everyone has their own favorite software that they like to use. Some people like MadTracker, some like FL Studio, some prefer Cubase -- the point is, people shouldn't waste their time telling the world that something is "crap", just because they prefer to use something else. There are advantages and disadvantages in all music software and nothing will ever be perfect.

Create whatever you want using whatever software you prefer to use or have access to. Once it's converted to .wav or .mp3, the majority of people don't care how it was made. If it's good, people will listen.

Just don't ever fall into the trap of "a bad workman always blaming his tools" Smile

wise words my friend

http://www.sonitusmusic.com
http://www.myspace.com/meltic

"You don't get harmony when everybody sings the same note." -Doug Floyd

Reply to topic

Post new topic

Page 3 of 3

All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3