aRGee
Registered User
Joined: 24 May 2003
Location: Holland
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 18:39
|
 |
By the way: why do you need an 8 hour ambient-wave file?
CD-quality:
44100 samples per second * 16 bit * 2 (stereo) = 1411200 bits per second = 176400 bytes per second * 60 * 60 * 8
= 5080320000 bytes per 8 hour = aprox 4.8 gigabyte 
Unless you want:
196000 samplerate
32 bit floating
stereo
196000 samples per second * 32 bit * 2 (stereo) = 12544000 bits per second = 1568000 bytes per second * 60 * 60 * 8
= 45158400000 bytes per 8 hour = aprox 42 gigabyte
Try loading that into madtracker.
Edit: Madtracker doesn´t support 32 bit  |
|
|
 Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Inge
Man-At-Arms
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 19:23
|
|
| aRGee wrote: |
|
By the way: why do you need an 8 hour ambient-wave file?
|
| SoulEye wrote: |
|
Details in private if somebody will help me.
|
There are reasons, and these reasons are apparently preferably not known in public. His choice, I'd say. |
Care for a game of Monopoly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aRGee
Registered User
Joined: 24 May 2003
Location: Holland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 19:46
|
|
| SoulEye wrote: |
|
Details in private if somebody will help me.
|
| Inge wrote: |
|
There are reasons, and these reasons are apparently preferably not known in public. His choice, I'd say.
|
Sorry, overlooked that sentence.
Though it makes me even more currious. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 19:59
|
|
Argee it doesn't work with selecting "wave". I still don't have that option on my soundcard's mixer 
I don't need an 8 gigabyte file... If you send me a sample of say 4mb and it sounds ok to me, then you can compress the big file using 192khz mp3 (not ogg) which will land around .. 400-500mb? (havent done the maths). |
http://www.souleye.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 21:23
|
|
ok, so how are you connecting the ins and outs of your soundcard to get that monofile?
and what is the make of your motherboard (that has the built in soundcard) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aRGee
Registered User
Joined: 24 May 2003
Location: Holland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 22:04
|
|
Inge was right. These sounds are looped static samples created from 22kHz, 8 bit, stereo *.wav-files.
I´ve recorded the requested environment as a 48kHz, 16bit, stereo wav-file. In Adobe Audition you can easily see the pattern repeating itself. By zooming in on sample level it´s easy to make a perfect loop of it:
http://argee.madtracker.net/Windchimes.wav
Just load the file in Adobe Audition select the whole waveform and push the loop-buttom.
Edit: The link doesn´t seem to work, so I also mailed it to your Madtracker Webmail.
Btw: Did you try to record in 32 bit floathing? Cause with me this resulted in a mono-file also. Try 16 bit instead. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14 2005 23:32
|
|
| aRGee wrote: |
http://argee.madtracker.net/Windchimes.wav
Just load the file in Adobe Audition select the whole waveform and push the loop-buttom.
Edit: The link doesn´t seem to work, so I also mailed it to your Madtracker Webmail.
Btw: Did you try to record in 32 bit floathing? Cause with me this resulted in a mono-file also. Try 16 bit instead.
|
The url worked fine. In face, I don't use my MT webmail (ever) so, if you do send me something, use souleye @t comhem.se.
I did not try 32 bit until I read this, but I got the same results nonetheless.
Your wav does not sound like the original. Have you normalized it? I'd prefer an untouched sample.
Grtz,
Souleye |
http://www.souleye.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aRGee
Registered User
Joined: 24 May 2003
Location: Holland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15 2005 12:53
|
|
| SoulEye wrote: |
Your wav does not sound like the original. Have you normalized it? I'd prefer an untouched sample.
Grtz,
Souleye
|
I´ve recorded the sound as hard as possible (without clipping) and normalized it afterwards. By using the biggest dynamic range possible when recording a wav-file, you get better quality.
But here is a new sample:
http://argee.madtracker.net/Windchimes2.wav |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Elijah
Registered User
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Eh?
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23 2005 07:08
|
|
soul... why dont you just record 2 mono files then mix them down in cool edit at 75% pan in each direction.. that would achieve a stereo result... no? |
- Elijah |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23 2005 07:51
|
|
Because I cannot choose to record the left or right channels separately. I would only get two joint stereo mono files which, when remixed, would come out as a mono file.
I also get noise when recording "what you hear".
Lets close this topic now, I've gotten the help I needed.
What you COULD help me with, is explaining the phallos in your avatar.... |
http://www.souleye.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26 2005 09:42
|
|
Final post: It appears my soundcard was/is faulty. It cannot record only from one source, but records from all sources at the same time. I did everything right from the beginning, but the hardware from creative (live 24bit) made it all impossible.
Thanks for all help anyway!!
Humbly, SoulEye |
http://www.souleye.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home/News
About
Download
Plugins
Tutorials
Register
Registered Users
Community
Music
Compo
Links
Forum
Recording "what you hear" in stereo?
Log in
Profile
FAQ
