How do you rate this entry? Please post your comments after having voted! |
Excellent! |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
Good |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
Average |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
Can do better |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 5 |
|
Samuele B
User
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
|
Posted: Mon May 29 2006 09:56 52. 2DAY I'M TECHNO (sequence 1) |
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
Title: 2DAY I'M TECHNO (sequence 1)
Rank: 52
Score: 43
Download
Ogg Version
Reviews
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
|
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
![](images/avatars/5991358254749c26453e45.jpg)
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04 2006 00:49
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
I'm a sucker for demotunes like this. I just cant get enough. My winamp is streaming kohina, slay radio, and nectarine all day and night long.
<3 |
http://www.souleye.se |
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Breaker
Registered User
![](images/avatars/1788454133454cba1bdd33b.jpg)
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04 2006 20:00
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
this sounds awesome, i can't believe it only got 52 place.... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
![](images/avatars/5991358254749c26453e45.jpg)
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04 2006 20:45
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
I agree... This is about 20th place or better in my book |
http://www.souleye.se |
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
CamBomb
User
![](images/avatars/gallery/MT/user.png)
Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Location: USA, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04 2006 22:32
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
actually i agree this should not have gotten 52nd this sounds really good. Sure it might not have made great use of vsts but this still sounds pretty good? Haven't checked the MT yet but i still think it should've gotten a bit higher than 52nd. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Samuele B
User
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22 2006 21:39
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
Thanks guys...i'm really surprised for this bad result.Two or three judges aren't enough to review a song. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
![](images/avatars/5991358254749c26453e45.jpg)
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24 2006 15:47
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
Wow, took you a while to respond ![Wink](images/smiles/icon_wink.gif) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25 2006 11:42
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
Samuele B wrote: |
Thanks guys...i'm really surprised for this bad result.Two or three judges aren't enough to review a song.
|
Well, considering the size of this community you won't get that many judges in the compos unfortunately, also keeping in mind that the judge should say more than just "this is cool" or "this sux". I stick by my review ![Wink](images/smiles/icon_wink.gif) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
SoulEye
Beta-Tester
![](images/avatars/5991358254749c26453e45.jpg)
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25 2006 16:04
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
The judges did a fantastic job. Too bad personal taste prevents them from giving top marks to every tune! ![Smile](images/smiles/icon_smile.gif) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Samuele B
User
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28 2006 00:21
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
I didn't said that the judges have done a bad work,SoulEye(thanks for your mini review,i like your entry too,i'll rate it)!Absolutely!
I only said that my tune isn't so good for some people,it's a normal and right thing! But Sunbuster,considering the size of this community a module could be reviewed by a big number of people so the average of an entry could be more "right";onestly i don't like the structure of the reviews:the first places have been reviewed by 4 judges,latest entries only by 2...why?All modules should have the same consideration!
greetings from Venice !!! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Sunbuster
Registered User
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28 2006 08:04
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
Samuele B wrote: |
But Sunbuster,considering the size of this community a module could be reviewed by a big number of people so the average of an entry could be more "right";
|
But not everyone becomes a judge, you volunteer for that job and you preferably should have done some reviews in the past or been active in the community also (have some credibility in other words) before you get the spot. Every year afaik it's been a struggle for Yannick to get even those 4-5 judges even though he's asked for people in the forums, and every year there are 1 or 2 who in the end can't spend so much time on the reviewing due to personal reasons. If I remember correctly one year we had 7 or so judges, but even then the bottom entries had only 2 reviews sometimes.
Samuele B wrote: |
onestly i don't like the structure of the reviews:the first places have been reviewed by 4 judges,latest entries only by 2...why?All modules should have the same consideration!
|
On that note I agree totally, every track should have the same amount of reviews, which is why everytime I've been a judge I've reviewed every entry. This year I was joined by TNK, who also reviewed every track. However again, not every judge can/will put down that much time on the reviewing (it took me about 2 months to do all the reviews), which is why the structure has been to concentrate on the tracks that have a shot at getting a price. It's unfair, but this way at least who gets a prize can't be decided by the score of one judge alone.
But this is a good talk, constructive critisism is always welcome ![Smile](images/smiles/icon_smile.gif) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Samuele B
User
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28 2006 21:16
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
i agree |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Inge
Man-At-Arms
![](images/avatars/29033980344a1b3eb59728.gif)
Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28 2006 21:50
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
I prioritized my reviews, since I lacked time to do all. Samuele B: your track was one of those that I found not good enough to push it up on my priority list. I agreed on the existing reviews and didn't feel the need to add counter weight. So, even though you only see two reviews, there's one implicit on the background that agrees with them. Although this won't be that nice to hear (hearing that your music isn't appreciated is never a nice thing), I hope it helps you believe in the validity of the final ranking. I personally do. |
Care for a game of Monopoly? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Samuele B
User
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01 2006 22:21
|
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](/img/theme8/f_icon_quote.gif) |
Inge,there's Sunbuster (for example) that reviewed all the entries...surely we have different points of view regarding the priority list as you say...but since you lacked time to do all the reviews i can see your intentions! hi |
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
|
|