MadTracker.org
Forum - 52. 2DAY I'M TECHNO (sequence 1)
Log in Log in Profile Profile Search Memberlist Usergroups FAQ FAQ
 Forum
2005 Feedback
 52. 2DAY I'M TECHNO (sequence 1)
Reply to topic Post new topic  
How do you rate this entry? Please post your comments after having voted!
Excellent!
60%
 60%  [ 3 ]
Good
20%
 20%  [ 1 ]
Average
20%
 20%  [ 1 ]
Can do better
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 5

Samuele B
User


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
PostPosted: Mon May 29 2006 09:56    
52. 2DAY I'M TECHNO (sequence 1)
Reply with quote

Title: 2DAY I'M TECHNO (sequence 1)
Rank: 52
Score: 43

Download
Ogg Version
Reviews

 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
SoulEye
Beta-Tester


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04 2006 00:49    
Reply with quote

I'm a sucker for demotunes like this. I just cant get enough. My winamp is streaming kohina, slay radio, and nectarine all day and night long.

<3


http://www.souleye.se
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Breaker
Registered User


Joined: 12 Feb 2006
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04 2006 20:00    
Reply with quote

this sounds awesome, i can't believe it only got 52 place....
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message
SoulEye
Beta-Tester


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04 2006 20:45    
Reply with quote

I agree... This is about 20th place or better in my book


http://www.souleye.se
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
CamBomb
User


Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Location: USA, Massachusetts
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04 2006 22:32    
Reply with quote

actually i agree this should not have gotten 52nd this sounds really good. Sure it might not have made great use of vsts but this still sounds pretty good? Haven't checked the MT yet but i still think it should've gotten a bit higher than 52nd.
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Samuele B
User


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22 2006 21:39    
Reply with quote

Thanks guys...i'm really surprised for this bad result.Two or three judges aren't enough to review a song.
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
SoulEye
Beta-Tester


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24 2006 15:47    
Reply with quote

Wow, took you a while to respond Wink
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Sunbuster
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25 2006 11:42    
Reply with quote

Samuele B wrote:
Thanks guys...i'm really surprised for this bad result.Two or three judges aren't enough to review a song.


Well, considering the size of this community you won't get that many judges in the compos unfortunately, also keeping in mind that the judge should say more than just "this is cool" or "this sux". I stick by my review Wink
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
SoulEye
Beta-Tester


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25 2006 16:04    
Reply with quote

The judges did a fantastic job. Too bad personal taste prevents them from giving top marks to every tune! Smile
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Samuele B
User


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28 2006 00:21    
Reply with quote

I didn't said that the judges have done a bad work,SoulEye(thanks for your mini review,i like your entry too,i'll rate it)!Absolutely!
I only said that my tune isn't so good for some people,it's a normal and right thing! Wink But Sunbuster,considering the size of this community a module could be reviewed by a big number of people so the average of an entry could be more "right";onestly i don't like the structure of the reviews:the first places have been reviewed by 4 judges,latest entries only by 2...why?All modules should have the same consideration! Shocked

greetings from Venice Dancing !!!
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Sunbuster
Registered User


Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28 2006 08:04    
Reply with quote

Samuele B wrote:
But Sunbuster,considering the size of this community a module could be reviewed by a big number of people so the average of an entry could be more "right";


But not everyone becomes a judge, you volunteer for that job and you preferably should have done some reviews in the past or been active in the community also (have some credibility in other words) before you get the spot. Every year afaik it's been a struggle for Yannick to get even those 4-5 judges even though he's asked for people in the forums, and every year there are 1 or 2 who in the end can't spend so much time on the reviewing due to personal reasons. If I remember correctly one year we had 7 or so judges, but even then the bottom entries had only 2 reviews sometimes.

Samuele B wrote:

onestly i don't like the structure of the reviews:the first places have been reviewed by 4 judges,latest entries only by 2...why?All modules should have the same consideration! Shocked


On that note I agree totally, every track should have the same amount of reviews, which is why everytime I've been a judge I've reviewed every entry. This year I was joined by TNK, who also reviewed every track. However again, not every judge can/will put down that much time on the reviewing (it took me about 2 months to do all the reviews), which is why the structure has been to concentrate on the tracks that have a shot at getting a price. It's unfair, but this way at least who gets a prize can't be decided by the score of one judge alone.

But this is a good talk, constructive critisism is always welcome Smile
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Samuele B
User


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28 2006 21:16    
Reply with quote

Smile i agree
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Inge
Man-At-Arms


Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: Nieuw Lekkerland @ Holland
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28 2006 21:50    
Reply with quote

I prioritized my reviews, since I lacked time to do all. Samuele B: your track was one of those that I found not good enough to push it up on my priority list. I agreed on the existing reviews and didn't feel the need to add counter weight. So, even though you only see two reviews, there's one implicit on the background that agrees with them. Although this won't be that nice to hear (hearing that your music isn't appreciated is never a nice thing), I hope it helps you believe in the validity of the final ranking. I personally do.


Care for a game of Monopoly?
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Samuele B
User


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Location: Venice
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01 2006 22:21    
Reply with quote

Inge,there's Sunbuster (for example) that reviewed all the entries...surely we have different points of view regarding the priority list as you say...but since you lacked time to do all the reviews i can see your intentions! Wink hi
 Back to top
View user's journal Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply to topic Post new topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

Copyright © 1998-2005 Yannick Delwiche
All rights reserved